, 2015; Cardoso and you can Souza, 2016; Santiago and you will Saliba, 2016; dos Santos and you may Jalalzai, 2021). Within work we shall focus on misogyny just like the acknowledged by our very own interviewees in the context of Rousseff’s six age when you look at the fuel, particularly targeting the partnership between misogynistic backlash as well as the gendered double bind personality identified. About following the area we offer a far more nuanced meaning having each one of the subcategories known (look for Table 2), taking stay-alone definitions and you can examples regarding investigation along with descriptive analyses off secret moments inside Rousseff’s presidency one exemplify brand new dynamic ranging from all of our nuanced proposal having viewing this new gendered twice join, misogynist backlash, as well as issues towards Rousseff’s presidency.
The newest five subcategories identified appeared in the information and knowledge in the differing levels (see Dining tables step 3, 4). A couple of themes appeared in higher proportion: Evaluation so you’re able to Dudes and Misogynyments themed just like the analysis to guys featured from inside the nearly 1 / 2 of all the interviews and portrayed thirty six % out of all comments codifiedments styled as the misogyny have been almost all comments (38 percent) and starred in 44 percent of the many interview. This means, interviewees was basically really aware from Rousseff’s character once the president in contrast some other male political leaders and you can hur mГҐnga postorderbrudar Г¤r bedrГ¤geri former presidents, therefore the indicates Rousseff is penalized throughout the their particular administration because of gendered assumption and backlash.
While you are searching which have quicker regularity regarding the interviews, one other a couple of layouts give extremely important framework so you’re able to facts you’ll sexist backlash within the presidency away from Brazil’s earliest lady chairman. Discussions how Rousseff tried to conform to gendered standards ascribed in order to female (Conforming into the Double Bind) appeared in more than ten percent of your own comment coded and you will interview used. At the same time, talk how Rousseff confronted the brand new gendered hopes of her condition (Difficult the fresh new Twice Join) appeared in more you to definitely 5th of all interviews, constituting sixteen per cent of all statements coded.
The brand new malfunction of mathematical density of your thematic analysis will bring a kick off point so you’re able to a qualitative study each and every motif, targeting the connection anywhere between for every single motif, especially the partnership within about three templates yourself connected with the brand new gendered double bind (review, conforming, and you can difficult) in addition to misogynistic backlash that used.
Assessment so you can dudes
One of many subcategories understood are contrasting away from Dilma Rousseff so you can dudes, both researching Rousseff so you’re able to male people in politics and you can discussing how one thing might possibly be other if Rousseff had been men. Ergo, we unearthed that there can be one another a conceptual role and important element of their analysis so you’re able to men. In a conceptual feel, we frequently saw the term, “if she have been a man” to spell it out exactly how a situation would have played away in different ways had Dilma maybe not come a woman. This new narrative represented in our interviews try out of a system one “prefers guys” (Respondent 88, ), having “no open gender discrimination, nevertheless undeniable fact that [a great politician] is actually a person was a bonus” (Respondent 8, ). When discussing it comparison far more concretely, there is certainly a look closely at Rousseff’s rough identity, the fresh new “difficult woman doing delicate men.” The brand new quote below brings much more perspective:
Talks throughout the Rousseff’s impeachment while the sexism and you can misogyny behind new techniques was basically discussed when you look at the popular mass media (Hao, 2016; Hertzman, 2016; Romero and you can Kaiser, 2016) as well as in scholarly functions (Zdebskyi mais aussi al
Yes, in addition they said that she was a difficult individual, one she cannot keep in touch with anyone, one she had an enthusiastic authoritarian technique for talking. Everything that for males appears as a supplement “zero, he or she is a challenging people, a home-convinced person that understands exactly what he wants.” In order to their own was presented given that negative “no, she does not understand how to chat, she is difficult, she’s this” in the a poor way. How they talk to us, female. I have hit a specific standing, we have been are severe, we are deviating out of in order to how to become a female, that is nice, transparent, quiet and like. The type of Dilma are is the style of ladies who have the ability to be good in this an entirely patriarchal globe, up against which purchase you to definitely is available (Respondent 79, ).